Unlock Editor’s Digest Lock for Free
FT editor Roula Khalaf will select your favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
The UK government is facing a controversial crunch vote on welfare reform, and the minister has refused to say whether their concessions are sufficient to stem the uprising by Labour lawmakers.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting said he was “in a better position” after the government watered down the reforms on disability benefits on Sunday, but he was not convinced there were numbers after more than 120 Labour lawmakers threatened rebels.
The government has 165 working houses. That means around 80 Labour lawmakers will need to oppose the Welfare Bill to defeat it, assuming that other parties are opposed, in response to abstaining.
“We’re in a much better position than last week,” Streeting told the BBC, but he admitted that there is still “a lot of trust that needs to be rebuilt.”
The Commons vote on Tuesday’s welfare bill has become a key test for Kiel’s Prime Minister Stage as Prime Minister Kiel approaches his first anniversary of office.
Priority moved to ease welfare reform last week after the government began to appear to lose votes despite the majority.
The changes to the government’s bill include committing not to take away disability benefits, known as personal independent payments, from those already receiving them – was seen as an important U-turn by the Prime Minister.
Critics say there is a risk that concessions will create a “two-tier” welfare system.
The priorities argue that reforms are essential to stop welfare budgets from rising more than ever, but the change will reduce government savings from nearly £5 billion to around £2 billion.
Combined with the previous U-turn on winter fuel payments for pensioners, Prime Minister Rachel Reeves has a £4.25 billion hole in his budget.
The Treasury says the hole won’t be filled by “permanent” borrowing, dictating how it will be funded in the fall budget, urging critics to warn Reeves that they need to increase taxes.
Many workers’ rebels said they are ready to support the welfare bill now, but dozens are understood to be modest, with many spending the weekend thinking about their options.
A Downing Street spokesman refused to say whether the government is “quietly confident” to win the vote when asked, but highlighted how many major rebels agreed to support the government after the concession.
They said the photo will become more clear on Monday after ministers set conditions for review of individual independence review by Minister of Social Security Disability, Sir Stephen Timmus.
However, it is unusual to get very close to the government’s main vote without a clearer grasp of the outcome, highlighting tensions within the labour.
Officials said they were having a “good conversation” with lawmakers about changes to the bill.
“With a review of TIMMS, we will protect the most vulnerable people and ensure that those who want to return to work are maintained a sustainable welfare system for the future,” they added. “This is important for all Labour lawmakers.”
TIMMS review of the assessment process for individuals’ independent payments brings input from people with disabilities, related charities, and lawmakers.
The government will also introduce a “right to attempt” law that means those who remove disability benefits to start new jobs will not automatically lose state support. This deals with situations where work is not going well.
On Monday, Labor and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall will issue a Commons statement outlining the government’s planned changes to welfare reform.
As it is not possible to change the actual text of the welfare bill at this stage, lawmakers are being asked to take the Minister’s statement as a promise that it will be changed later.
Paula Barker, a Labour MP for Liverpool Wavertree, helped organize the rebellion against the bill, which, while “unquestionable,” said many enemies were won by the government.
“Some colleagues are waiting to hear what the minister is saying tomorrow,” Barker added. “The key issue is that whatever the written minister’s statement is not on the surface of the bill, and trust is at the lowest ever.”
Labour MP Vicki Foxcroft, who resigned from his position as whipping the government’s welfare bill earlier this month, told the Guardian that Starme’s concessions have not been made well.
She hadn’t decided how she would vote on Tuesday, but she said she wanted to see further improvements to the government’s plans, adding, “I hope we will actually start to begin listening to people with disabilities and their organizations.”
Louise Hay, one of the leading Labour rebels, said she would vote for the bill now, adding that “slight concessions” have been made, but she insisted that the government must learn from the crisis.
Starmer admitted to the Times on Sunday when he didn’t have everything right, and acknowledged his recent focus until the middle of last week was the Iran crisis and the G7 and NATO summit.
He dismissed it because he argued that “Bolox” was a particular focus for rebel rage for his treatment of welfare reform, Prime Minister Morgan McSweeney, is the real driving force behind government decision-making.
