Diddy’s “Two Angry Men”
There are no celebrity sex tapes, minors in criminal cases…
Pro or fraud for defense? ! ?
Published
Two angry men podcasts
DiddyThe defense of the film may be supported by the fact that there is a lot of noise about celebrities sex tapes and minors involved in Diddy criminal cases… These two things are not part of the case and can have a big impact on the ju judge.
In “Two angry men” Podcasts, Harvey Levin and Marc Jelagos We investigated one of the perceptions of the Diddy criminal case and how it poses a ju judge.
There is a false story about a celebrity sex tape and minors being part of the prosecution’s evidence against Didi… With some people including potential ju-journers, this case is under the false impression of the hip-hop version Jeffrey Epstein.
I know neither of these sleazy topics will be talked about in court…and while Mark thinks that when it comes to choosing a ju umpire, it may harm Diddy’s defense, Harvey sees it as an opportunity for Diddy’s legal team.
A ju judge may go to trial thinking that the ju judge will hear about the dirt the prosecution has on Didi. It can also be a bit disappointing when no evidence of a secret record of a celebrity in which sex or minors are involved in any form, shape or shape is presented.
Mark needs a bit of persuasiveness here… but Harvey points out some good points.
The selection of ju judges begins on Monday, and the judges hope that within three days the ju judges will be selected… so this is all unfolding in the Manhattan courtroom.
TMZ has a lot of Diddy coverage when the trial begins…and be sure to check it out “Two Angry Men” Podcast Wherever you listen to podcasts.
